Page 1 of 1
Posted on April 23 at 5:59 p.m.
Small and poor colonies historically have self-serving leaders and a wide gap between high and low self-esteem citizens. At the same time, comfortable living is usually less expensive in a colony and opportunities to do or be something unique are more plentiful. Take chances, make choices, enjoy life - or go catch up with your more plentiful flock ...elsewhere. For good and for ill we live in a distant economic colony of the Northeast - what Prof. Mark Carlton dubbed the "BosWash," the metropolitan region of Boston to Washington and all powers in between. Colonies aren't for whining and waiting for others - that's urban life and it's easy to find ...elsewhere.
Name your "alleged major conglomerate" dreamer and the "other projects in the Baton Rouge area that have gotten similar brushoffs."
Expound upon your oblique allegations KnowBizz.
I dare y'all.
Posted on April 18 at 5:45 p.m.
You seem to have possible answers to at least half of your rhetorical questions. Now that you have created interest, please share your ideas.
Page 1 of 1
Posted on April 23 at 7:33 p.m.
Coming back after supper I've noticed that in my last post "plentiful flock" would have read better as populous flock.
Also:
dreamer, in what of the many possible ways do you mean "politics as usual?"
KnowBizz, are you implying that the State Film Commissioner is corrupt and that that is unusual?
On LIGHTS! CAMERA! INACTION?